glasses free Sundays
January 25, 2012
This blog isn’t about glasses, and my goal is always to wear glasses less or not at all, so I tend not to write about how often I wear glasses, or what prescription. It’s a tiresome subject! But this post needs a bit of introduction. Around 2009 I probably wore glasses the least, even managing to do a lot of my work without glasses. While I was stressed out finishing my phd in 2010 and 2011, I depended on -5 glasses a lot more for computer work, and that led to wearing them more and more in the evenings and weekends (when not needed).
On Sundays, to encourage myself to use glasses less, I’ve started doing ‘glasses free Sundays’. I don’t wear glasses at all on Sundays. This last Sunday was my third one in a row. I’m enjoying many benefits from this idea. Most importantly it reminds me of how much I can do without my glasses.
When I have glasses free Sundays a couple of things happen – I use my computer less! This means I’m up and moving about more. I end up taking a break from work/emails/web surfing. My mantra needs to be: less reading, more doing. It is all too easy to read about things I’m intrested in rather than going out and actually doing them, the web really enables this. So on Sundays my computer time is limited to what I’m willing to do without glasses. And this is really the bare minimum of emails. I don’t pack the day full of chores, I leave time for me to have fun. I’m getting creative again in the way I practice the Bates method.
Although I think reduced prescription glasses have helped me in many ways, by enabling me to go on with the Bates method, but still have a back up for work situations, wearing glasses is a huge hindrance because it is all too easy to simply forget to practice when glasses provide the security to see. It is too easy to forget to reduce the reduced prescription glasses to continue improvement. It also builds a ‘special’ dependence on glasses. Whereas before (2007) I was ‘dependent’ on glasses, now I feel ‘dependent’ on glasses for important situations. This situation is almost worse than before because it creates a psychological block to further vision improvement. When I have a great period with amazing visionl, I have recently become aware of a thought pattern which says: oh, this vision is great, but it still won’t be good enough to drive/go to work/watch a presentation, I’ll need my glasses anyway later. I’m sabatoging myself with these thoughts and with this relationship to using glasses for important tasks! Accepting clear vision has got to be total – accepting it into all of my life.
So, glasses free Sundays are a way of getting back in touch with what I can do without glasses. I surprise myself – I can sit down at the piano and often still read the notes! I can write a few emails and read the text! When I go for walks I can read licence plates from distances of 5-10 meters. I can recognize faces across the street. And I start to accept the fact that my vision is getting better. On the other days, I’ve still got odd and end things to take care of, and I still reach for the glasses. But I’m reaching for them less. I’m back in my exploratory mode of seeking a growing number of experiences where glasses are not necessary, where I can trust my eyes.
January 25, 2012 at 5:07 pm
Sorrisi.
Great post, putting into words what many of us on this vision improvement journey struggle with. I’ve decided to be stubborn and not wear glasses at all, not because I’m such a noble dedicated Bates follower, but because they are so uncomfortable! If I even think of putting them on I can feel the strain creep in, so I do the best I can with my natural vision, often surprising myself with what I can see as you said. I remind myself I would have never found out how well I could see without glasses if I’d grabbed for glasses as soon as I got worried that I wouldn’t be able to see!
Be gentle with yourself — this is not a competition. I’ve learned to just pause a little, thinking, “Maybe this will clear up if I just scan and breathe, and I can see it well enough without my glasses”, and I often can. Holding myself back from rushing to “get it done” is a big one for me. Every day is another chance to do it right, with presence and calm attention. I’ve got all my many pairs of glasses in the car and haven’t used them for months, but they’re there if I really feel the need. Even if I got my driver’s license renewed without the “needs glasses” restriction, I would still have to keep up the healthy vision habits — I couldn’t just rest then and stop paying attention, seeing like a robot like i did for so many years. Keep going forward and being such a great example for us, and don’t spend too much time mourning what you think you did wrong in the past, which was just to help you get here now! I am proud to know you, thrilled that you got your Phd, and eager to hear about your future triumphs. Take care.
Nancy
January 26, 2012 at 10:06 am
Hi Nancy! thank you! every day I learn to be more gentle with myself. I’m glad you pointed out the competition aspect since I think that is an easy trap with something like this. Glasses free Sundays isn’t a competition with myself, if it doesn’t work out on one sunday for any reason it’s not like I’ll beat myself up
I probably should have clarified that in the text! I see it as a fun day which I can use for personal exploration.
Sorrisi
January 25, 2012 at 5:28 pm
This is great and so encouraging! I love that you were working on a phD/being in school and still able to practice Bates method. I will be continuing on in higher education too and this really inspires me. Congratulations on your 3 weeks of glasses free Sundays and keep going at it!
January 26, 2012 at 10:08 am
thank you XiXi! In retrospect, doing the Bates method during my phd was the PERFECT time to be learning to see more clearly. Although a higher degree is a lot of work, there is also more flexibility (so those long hours can easily be broken up with palming and walks outside without glasses!). Good luck with your studies! I hope you will find as I did that a higher degree leads you to more introspection as well, so the Bates method really does help with that.
Sorrisi
January 25, 2012 at 10:54 pm
I did something similar a while ago – I decided that for one year, I would not wear glasses on Sunday mornings. I had to wait until noon to use them. Towards the end of the year it got frustrating when I wanted to do something and couldn’t (like drive). But overall it was a postitive move. I should do that again.
January 26, 2012 at 10:15 am
Hi Robert, thanks for letting me know! Let me know how it goes when you do it again. I would have one suggestion – try planning your day (or morning) in advance so that you don’t get frustrated by things you feel like you can’t do. For example, I make sure on Saturday that I have taken care of certain things I know I will want my glasses for, so that on Sunday I am free to not need them. It’s like planning a day of play and rest in advance. I realize it’s not always possible, but your goal of a Sunday morning just for you certainly should be! Make it special and fun, do things you normally don’t make time for, e.g., take a stroll, invite a neighbor over for breakfast, draw a picture. Cheers,
Sorrisi
January 26, 2012 at 10:02 am
Hi Clark Night – thanks for the update! What an amazing set of resources! You are amazing, thank you so much for all the hard work you’ve done to make the Bates method accessible to everyone!!
Sorrisi
January 26, 2012 at 10:18 am
For whatever reason, Clark Night’s comment with amazing resources is not showing up on the actual post (or if you can see it let me know) Here is what Clark Night wrote:
Like this post!
Better Eyesight Magfazine is on-line now, 2 places, as we were planning in the past. All Issues. Print yourself a paragraph to read without glasses in the sun during your days when not wearing glasses.
Otrignal; http://books.google.com/books?id=Ghd_TJhqvTcC&pg=PP28&dq=better+eyesight+magazine&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Wx8gT7yOGoTi0QG9-N0H&ved=0CGsQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=better%20eyesight%20magazine&f=false
with 500 pictures; http://books.google.com/books?id=myBIOOPhoU4C&printsec=frontcover&dq=better+eyesight+magazine&hl=en&sa=X&ei=QB8gT_f1IMfl0QHB5vkF&ved=0CFkQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q&f=false
on website for copy/paste… http://cleareyesight.info/id43.html
January 26, 2012 at 11:35 am
As usual, your posts are so relevant and meaningful! It makes me understand that incompletely dependent on my glasses (lower prescription only) for work. With pretty much everything else I get along without glasses, but for work I really need them. Interestingly enough computer is kind if ok, I have to sit closer etc., but I still do it without glasses – but my work comprises mostly of playing the piano. How interesting that you feel you can see the notes without glasses and I can’t, is it indeed a question if dependability? I like playing the piano without glasses, even when I read notes, when I’m by myself, without the need to do it right because it’s work.
I see this pattern clearly in me now, but I don’t feel I can let go of it, I don’t feel I can just go to work without glasses and not disturb everyone because I don’t see well enough! I guess I need to take it easy on myself and help myself into it slowly with time…
Thank you for the inspiration!!
January 26, 2012 at 9:18 pm
Hi Fuoco, How interesting. It does look to be a question of dependence, psychological dependence. If you look at it like you did: I see music notes without glasses, but use glasses for the computer. You use glasses for piano, but not for the computer.
I am planning a post about using positive affirmations (but we know how fast I am at writing posts these days!) So I think I will write most of it here to you: positive affirmations are a great way to overcome these types of psychological blocks and dependencies. I encountered affirmations for some other work I’m doing, (using ‘The Artist’s Way’ as an inspiration to get me into drawing and painting regularly). I realized affirmations would be useful with vision improvement.
I have been using the following affirmations recently: ‘I accept clear vision’, and ‘I enjoy seeing beauty in every day detail’. The first affirmation has helped me a lot with this issue we’re talking about now. When I realized that I don’t trust my vision for ‘important’ tasks, I realized I needed to do something more psychological to trust my good vision. So, everyday when I wake up, I tell myself ‘I accept clear vision’. And in my journal I repeat that, writing it out three times. Now, the interesting thing about affirmations is that you’ll do it once, it will feel weird and hokey, and then you’ll forget about it. Don’t let that happen! I challenge you to do this (use a similar affirmation that you really think will help you) every day for two weeks. That will mean writing the affirmation into your planner, your calendar, on your bathroom mirror, everywhere you can so that you will remember. Then see if it starts to pay off.
Maybe you could ease into it by playing for small groups without glasses, and then branch out from there. Really, though, make sure you keep the fun in it! Keep to what I wrote in my last post – don’t practice struggle.
Since I’ve been doing positive affirmations, I have found myself often admitting that my vision is pretty good. I will give myself time to look rather than reach for glasses. And I venture out again, into shops and social situations without glasses. Something that used to be fun for me, that I’m now starting to enjoy again. Today, I was able to read a licence plate from 20 meters away! This is definitely a huge milestone for me! Especially since that is the legal requirement for driving in the UK! The biggest sign of success for me was that when this happened, instead of thinking to myself, oh, but I couldn’t read it in a driving test, I thought to myself: I will keep practicing like I am, and pretty soon I will be able to pass a drivers test without glasses!
Let me know if it helps you. On another note, since you are an accomplished pianist, could you tell me, have you come across this online piano method book by Chuan Chang: http://www.pianopractice.org/
If you have, what do you think of it? If you haven’t, it’s very wordy, so don’t worry. Or if you’re curious, just check out the introduction that starts on p. 24. I am thinking of using this book to practice with since I can’t afford a teacher. I’m sure you’re cringing! I had a piano teacher from the age of 8 to 12, so I can play basic songs and am hoping with practice to be able to play Mozart, Beethoven, and … someday… Chopin. If you know of any other good method books or similar pedagogy tools, please let me know!
Best, Sorrisi
January 26, 2012 at 10:40 pm
Wow Sorrisi, this book is extremely detailed. I started reading a bit and find it very interesting and informative. I should definitely keep reading, as it seems I could learn from it too!
I don’t know much about teaching myself, I don’t have any experience and believe it’s not an easy thing at all to be a good teacher. If I were you I would stick to that book for some time, especially if you feel you can be helped by it and build on the ground you already have. Let me know how it goes.
About the affirmations, it indeed feels quite strange, and I find myself reluctant to take on it, but I should probably give it a chance, right? At the moment I’m not exactly sure how to do that, but I’ll give it a thought and see how I can make it fit me, hopefully I come up with something interesting
January 27, 2012 at 10:38 am
Hi Fuoco, cool, glad you got a good first impression from the book, I’ll keep going with it!
For the affirmations, perhaps just write out your thoughts about vision improvement. Write out things like, ‘my vision is improving’ and ‘I accept clear vision’ over and over, and see what kind of negative thoughts pop up. Write down those negative thoughts and reflect on them. It may be that by figuring out where those negative thoughts come from, you can resolve some issues. Further, if you can turn those negatives into positives, that will provide a good source for the most powerful affirmations (e.g., if one negative thought that comes up is ‘but you never get permanent improvement’, then try an affirmation like ‘I can permanently improve my vision’. Just believing it can happen can lead you to practice more, accept positive changes, and see it through.
Keep it simple, and boil it down to just a couple positive statements. I hope to hear from you in a couple of weeks (or sooner of course). Even more, I hope that helps!
Sorrisi
February 3, 2012 at 4:55 pm
Hey Sorrisi, you know, this week I tried playing the piano without glasses a few times. It want marvelous, I played pretty badly, simply because I couldn’t see the notes well enough, even from quite close. But it seemed to me when I stopped playing and looked over the notes again, I felt like I see them a bit better. So theres a point, something mentally probably affects my vision in a wrong way while I’m playing. More or less what we were saying…
Besides I’ve always had the feeling that when I play in an emotionally involved way (sounds stupid, but I don’t know how to better express it), I tend to tense up, gather tension in upper parts of the body including neck and eyes, and probably not breath so well either. This is a difficult issue, I don’t know how to avoid, without “hurting the music”. Play less involved doesn’t come as an option, because then its not worth it anymore, but I guess it’s another part of a journey to improve!
About the glasses and indexes, both of you have good points, you guys got me confused!
February 6, 2012 at 6:16 pm
Hi Fuoco, that’s a good sign that you saw better after playing piano without glasses. Maybe just keep it up a few times a week just as an experiment. Do you ever play from memory? it might be an interesting way to play without glasses.
It didn’t sound stupid what you said about emotionally involved playing! I know what you mean, even as an amateur musician, I’ve played the violin for many years and there is something special about making music and expressing passages with different emotions. I have noticed that in forums, that professional players are very thankful for the Alexander TEchnique. Have you looked into that? Apparently it helps them to release some of this strain that comes with being so involved wiht the music. Of course you will still need to feel the music and perhaps even strain your muscles to do it, but one becomes able to release the tension when it is not needed. Perhaps that could help? It would be something to experimentent with – experiment now and then – breathing during a part you normally don’t breathe during, and see what happens musically. It’s ok to feel it out during practice. Maybe it will surprise you? You can see if it is possibleto be just as involved in the music, but still aware of your body? Just some ideas, I guess my main message there is to experiment!
In terms of the glasses, I’d summarize it like this – if you can afford it, there is no question that you will get the best quality from a higher cost lens that you buy from a high street optometrist. If you have to buy the cheapos, then it will just take some experimenting with the exact same prescription specs from different companies to see which ones come back better.
February 3, 2012 at 10:49 pm
Speaking of piano…
I’m not a pianist, but I do enjoy fooling around with my keyboard from time-to-time. I actually had a revelation the other day…after a few tries I was actually able to harmonize decently (for a non-pianist) with a song that was going pretty fast. I was able to let loose and just do it, without practicing it slowly at first. It just flowed. This correspdonded to a 24 hour periold of both visual improvement and clearer thought. There is someting about piano that is intriguing, and I’ve fooled with it for years. I like to say that I had it in me to become a great composer, I just never learned the instrument properly. I do have several family members who are professional musicians…I really think there is something in my brain that gives me a tendency to have an interest in this. But I have chosen a different artform rather than music as my main thing.
January 27, 2012 at 11:12 pm
I think this is a great idea, but personally, I think I need more than this…a targeted computer free day would be ideal. I realize I’ve used it too often, and I don’t really need it quite that much. And it destroys my vision so well. A lot more than any glasses are capable of doing. Ironically, a lot of the reason the computer damages my eyes, is because of not using glasses, which gets me too close, and out of posture.
As you alluded to, I think you may have used glasses that were too strong, fogetting to reduce them again. -5 is most surely too strong now, except maybe for driving. If -3 or even -4 is too weak, you can get something in between. To put it into perspective, I’m currently using -2, and my last appointment put my more nearsighted eye at 4.50. I can see between 20/70 and 20/40 with the -2, depending on the conditions. Also, reduced lenses are not just about lower power. I also reduced the difference between the two lenses by a half diopter compared to my “official” glasses. The strongest glasses I currently use for night driving are still a full diopter lower than the official glasses for distance. The idea is to be able to see 20/70 to 20/30 with both eyes open (20/40 for driving, preferably due to law). The reduced glasses help with that, but if prescribed right, they don’t compress depth at all, and they don’t lock your focus and convergence at a single position the way a full or overcorrecting prescription does. They are actually very safe, despite some concerns to the contrary…as long as you are still practicing proper visual habits, and you take them off frequently. I like your idea of a glasses free day.
I don’t feel a “special dependence”. I wore glasses full-time for 7 years. Talk about dependence and deafeningly intense blur. The current situation is nothing of the sort.
January 30, 2012 at 9:29 am
Hi FMR, thanks for the interesting comments. The only reason I wear glasses is for the reason you stated, otherwise I lean forward too much. The effect of rounding my shoulders and compressing my lungs is a way bigger strain than wearing glasses for me. It’s definitely trial and error to find the right strength. For computer, my requirement is that I can lean back and see the screen well enough to read. I can do that now with -3 glasses, barely. But I decided not to wear my -5 glasses on the computer anymore so that’s it! I will be going back to the optometrist and I’ll probably pick up a -4 pair. I don’t order the cheap glasses online anymore, there is a huge difference in quality, and I think the better index of refraction in the more expensive high street glasses is worth the trouble.
If you are using a computer so much, I agree, a computer free day would be very good – stretch out your vision outside! But don’t give up when using the computer during the week. Taking a break every 30 minutes to look elsewhere for 5 minutes (preferably out the window while doing some back and shoulder stretches) can do wonders. It counteracts the leaning in problem, and this break really does help the vision a lot throughout the day. If you read the health and safety warning on computer monitors and video games, they eveen often suggest 15 minutes break every hour. I think that is spot on if you can manage it. Also, blink more, studies show people blink less when using a computer.
Sorrisi
January 30, 2012 at 10:50 am
Hey Sorrisi, you mention lower quality glasses bought online…. For 2-3 years I’m using exclusively my under corrected glasses bought online like that for about 30-40$ or so, and was often concerned about their quality, and specifically if maybe it could cause damage or somehow more strain than glasses from opticians. What do you think? What is index of refraction in relation to glasses?
I’m using contacts like about a couple of hours per month or so, only in specific situations where I don’t want to be with glasses. I get them online too, but as far as I can tell it’s the same as the ones sold to me by the optician, same producer and specification, but a bit cheaper!
February 1, 2012 at 11:22 am
Hi Fuoco, Regarding contacts, I agree, it is the same producer and I think the quality is fine – and they are cheaper!
Regarding glasses, there are many other factors (grinder, material, etc) that complicate it. I was able to compare once the same diopter of glasses, one with cheap lenses and one with better ones. I could see much sharper through the more expensive ones and the colors in the cheaper ones were more visibly washed out. I haven’t seen an online company that publishes their index of refractions. Actually, unlike FRM, I think the highest refraction index is better. As far as I understand, the high index lenses are the lighter, more expensive material. The light is bent more efficiently through less material, so less loss of light. Perhaps FMR means that if a company uses high index material but then doesn’t grind them precisely, there is more opportunity for distortion. But the disadvantage of a poorly ground low index material is that there is distortion plus loss of light.
The best possible combination (in my opinion) is high index, with a very pure material, that is precisely ground. I expect that won’t be cheap, online or off. And if that’s what I want, I can only be assured of getting it from an optometrist. I’d be interested in what FMR has to say if I’ve understood his reasons for recommending low index correctly.
Now, that still doesn’t answer the question of whether the cheap glasses are worse for the eyes than the expensive glasses. This is conjecture, but I think since it is possible to see better through the more expensive glasses, a lower prescription can be bought, so therefore the more expensive glasses are better for the eyes. The distortion and loss of color vibrancy is a big strain in cheap glasses. Call around and just ask before making an appointment if an optometrist will make a reduced pair of glasses for computer work or piano practice. They will say ok, and you don’t have to go into defending the Bates method if you don’t want to. Just say you tried it out with cheap glasses and it is more comfortable for you, or something like that
As much as Bates people are anti-optometrists, I think there are many advantages of going, and I will visit mine this month. They accurate measure the distance between your pupils and make sure the glasses fit straight on your face. They also check for other eye diseases. As a bonus, you get used to being there, can learn to relax even under these conditions, and get a record of your (hopefully) improving eyesight.
Cheers,
Sorrisi
January 31, 2012 at 10:34 pm
fuoco,
If you’re purchasing your glasses online, the biggest issues are that the lenses may have a bit more distortion, and the frames might not be adjusted properly. Buy the lowest index lens you can, because it has better optical quality. Thankfully, computer lens grinding has helped, and the quality of the online glasses today shouldn’t be too much worse than the standard glasses of 30 years ago. of course, today’s latest lenses are a lot better than anything you can purchase online. Also, stick to simple lenses, never buy a bifocal or anything like that from an online vendor. The simple lenses are harder to screw up.
February 1, 2012 at 11:29 am
Hi FMR,
could you let me know where you got the info about low index glasses being better?
As you’ll see from my comment to fuoco, I think high index is better – it is a more pure material that bends the light more efficiently. The result is thinner glasses and less dimming of color. That is my personal experience with it anyway. Maybe we’re talking about two different things?
Best, Sorrisi
January 31, 2012 at 10:36 pm
Also, having purchased before, I know that sometimes you luck out and a get a good pair; other times you might get one with some issues. It’s a gamble, basically. But again, go with teh low index lenses, as they are harder to mess up and have better optics (as far as the plastic material itself is concerned).
January 31, 2012 at 11:06 pm
Sorrisi,
You might be reducing too fast with -4. I’d go a half diopter if it were me. Remember, your eyes can only adjust by about .25 at a time. If you have a -4 pair from an online vendor already, you might want to try those first to verify whether they’re strong enough to give you the comfort and posture you want. You could even go down by just .25 if you want…but I doubt you want to spend big money on a good pair of frames and lenses only to cut by .25. With -4, you might have to sit a bit closer. Anyway, it’s great you have a doc willing to let you have custom lens powers.
February 1, 2012 at 11:28 am
Hi FMR,
I don’t believe in ‘rules’ about reducing diopters. It is really just trial and error! I went from -5 one day, to a glasses free sunday, to -3 the next time I used my computer (just because those are the two I happen to have lying around) and I was fine. I can sit at a normal distance most of the time, so I think with -4 I will be able to sit at a normal distance all of the time. The -4 ones I used to have broke, but I remember they were fine. I’ve already got frames, I just pop out the old (stronger) lenses and ask the optometrist for new ones – saves movney!
February 2, 2012 at 10:23 pm
Sorrisi,
Good luck with the new glasses…hope you get them soon.
As for lenses: in an ideal world, we’d all get lenses form a good optician…capitalism and good quality go hand in hand. Of course, that’s not always practical. because my own current eye doctor’s office cannot refract if their life depends on it (the doctors don’t actually take part in this, just office staff people with minimal training) and are unwilling to prescribe lenses for comfort rather than max acuity, I have to go other routes for lenses at the moment. Someday I’ll be an eye doctor, and this will all be moot of course.
As for lens material, the lower index lenses (CR39 plastic, specifically), which are the lowest index lenses, actually have a much lower aberration value compared to polycarbonate (typical mid to high index material from which the majority of lenses are made). I’ve never actually had CR-39 lenses myself, but I may try them out at some point just to see if they are really better. But from a physics standpoint, they are definitely better on paper. There are also various “high index plastics”, and these are probably pretty comparable in optical quality to CR39, but can be ground much thinner. With cheap lenses, I believe it’s easier to grind the lower index CR39 more accurately, because less grinding precision is required due to the greater thickness, whereas for higher index materials, you need finer control of your grinding system, I would imagine. So there is at least one, and there may even be a twofold advantage to the low index plastic insofar as optics are concerned. Also, they block less UV than poly C…a blessing or curse, depending on your viewpoint.
February 6, 2012 at 6:06 pm
interesting, it sounds like I understood you right.
February 4, 2012 at 1:27 am
A big-name commercial/corporate optometric practice/optical shop features overcorrecting glasses in a current ad. They claim a more accurate measurement technique, and show a person in a life situation being able to read a book form 15 feet away.